Gatto wants capital move part of bill to increase House, Senate numbers


Published on Thursday, February 4, 2010 7:13 PM AKST

While the numbers won’t be known until next year, it’s more than likely there will be changes in how residents are represented in Juneau. Because areas like the Valley have gained more population in recent years, and other areas have lost residents, the number of representatives and senators will be different.

That worries people in rural regions where they could stand to lose some representation. To alleviate those concerns, a bill has been introduced that would expand the number of legislators to 48 House members and 24 senators. Those numbers are 40 and 20 today.

That’s where Rep. Carl Gatto, a Republican serving the Valley, comes in. He suggests adding 12 more legislators and their attendant staffs will overload the current state capitol, a building some have said is crowded as it is. So, he thinks, if we have to find more space, then we should just as well find someplace more centrally located.

Never mind that a couple of years ago voters defeated a capitol move fairly handily.

Moving the capitol has been bandied about since Soapy Smith was bilking miners in Skagway. Sitka was the first site for the center of government. But, according historians, Juneau outpaced Sitka in population and industry, so the move was made.

By that reasoning, Anchorage should have been the capital city decades ago.

It should also be noted, according to the state’s website, that the current capitol was built in 1931. Obviously, it’s undergone numerous renovations over the years, but what is the realistic lifespan of a nearly 80-year-old building?

As long as people can be shoe-horned into the present building, there won’t be much support for the move. People just aren’t willing to pay for major projects anymore. But if there’s ever any talk of building a new capitol in Juneau, then Gatto will get lots of backing.

In the Valley, voters recently turned down bonds to repair schools. If we don’t want to fix leaky roofs, we certainly aren’t going to want to pay for a multi-million-dollar building project.

Rep. Gatto is off-base on this one, but he has fired a shot off the bow of people who think the capitol-move issue is dead. There are many Alaskans out there who remember voting twice in the ’70s for the move, only to be told it wouldn’t happen both times.

 

Comments

13 comment(s)

    Fizzle Pop dud wrote on Feb 9, 2010 9:58 PM:

    " Double Public Pension Carl finally wants to do something. Amazing. The guy hasn't earned an honest buck since before statehood. Now, he brings back an old, tired idea that flies like fireworks-all show , fizzle and dud. Kinda like Carl. "

    Neanderthal wrote on Feb 9, 2010 12:12 AM:

    " Just one more hillbilly wanna-be politician who can't fix our current problems so he's trying to resurrect a dead horse. 90 days is too long at that --- "

    Power Wagon wrote on Feb 8, 2010 7:03 PM:

    " Houston, Willow, Anchorage, Glennallen...anywhere but in Juneau where you can't get there without airfare or a ferry. Doesn't make sense. "

    Rex in Wasilla wrote on Feb 8, 2010 6:26 PM:

    " Mr Gatto- We have enough "Rogues", charlatans, liars, and thieves in the valley already! The convicted members of our political system have brought enough shame to the valley. I say build it in Anchorage, where they have enough cops (state, city and feds) to keep an eye on the rascals. We have the best politicos money can buy, Don"t believe it? ask pete,vic, georginna et al. Seems to be true that an honest pol is one that when ya buy him, he stays bought. "

    Most states wrote on Feb 6, 2010 11:30 AM:

    " I know Alaskans don't care what they do in the lower 48 but the fact is that most state capitols are in a smaller city. Salem Or, Oly Wa, Harrisburg Pa, Austin Tx. Many of them located in a "neutral" or central place & without the legislator presence & cash trickledown most would collapse. Juneau is unique that its the only one hardly anyone can get to. "

    loser wrote on Feb 6, 2010 12:14 AM:

    " Forget all this talk. Carl hasn't gotten anything thru the legislature since the cruise bill and he got spanked by the majority caucus for that one. He couldn't get a meaningful bill passed and everyone in Juneau knows it. He is full of big talk and little results. "

    Leave it in Juneau. wrote on Feb 5, 2010 11:58 PM:

    " I live in the Valley & DO NOT want all those politicians running around here. The further away , the better. "

    offsoapstone wrote on Feb 5, 2010 5:41 PM:

    " Yes the capital should not be in Juneau just so more people could have access to their elected officials. As to adding more legislators at this time I have to say no. What we need are brighter legislators with new or better ideas to move this state forward. "

    Palmer Farm wrote on Feb 5, 2010 12:58 PM:

    " Every dept within the State has its flag office located in Juneau. I know from first had experience that because the population down there is so much smaller, that they end up having to hire from very small applicant pools. The result is very poor results and performance from those State offices located down there. Equally-sized dept offices in Anchorage are usually twice as efficient. Just one more reason why having the capital in Juneau is silly. The residents there can squawk all they want, the only reason they want it there is for their own selfish needs. "

    Setting the record straight wrote on Feb 5, 2010 12:49 PM:

    " Yes, the voters did approve a capital move. We were told it would cost nothing for taxpayers as the state said enough state land could be sold in the area chosen at $10,000 per acre to pay it. On that information the voters approved the move. Later, it was admitted that this estimate was a bit off. In fact the new capital would cost about $3,000,000.000. Anew vote was held and the move was voted down by the taxpayers/voters. This was in the days before the Permanent Fund and the three billion dollars was in 1970's dollars. I was here. "

    capital move to valley wrote on Feb 5, 2010 12:12 PM:

    " it would be better if the capital was where more people are located and
    where more people could access
    it and be represented.. "

    move it now wrote on Feb 5, 2010 11:45 AM:

    " Thanks Carl. Alaskans have been deprived of fully particpating in state government for too long. Moving it to Anchorage makes sense. The only reason it never happened after the two votes back in the day was the greed of a majority who put their own interest above the voters'. "

    Good job Carl wrote on Feb 5, 2010 9:06 AM:

    " Many of your constituents are in complete agreement with you! Thank you for speaking up for us! Juneau is ridiculously hard to get to for most of the population. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   




Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage