Wasilla to buy mall for future library

BY TODD L. DISHER
Frontiersman
Published on Friday, November 20, 2009 4:07 AM AKST

WASILLA — The city is planning to buy the Meta Rose Square as the future home for the Wasilla Public Library, a move that has shocked the library steering committee and the shopping center’s tenants.

Wasilla has signed a purchase agreement to pay $1.5 million for the indoor shopping center in the heart of downtown, Public Works Director Archie Giddings said. The city will convert the building from its current retail configuration into a library 2.5 times larger than the current building.

The money for the project will come entirely from the city’s coffers, but Giddings said it was determined the city could pay for the building without drawing its reserve fund below the amount legally required.

(Use arrows above to view more photos)

The city administration presented the plan to city council in a Nov. 9 executive session. Councilwoman Leone Harris, who said the city has long been looking for a new building for the library, said the council jumped on the opportunity, directing the administration to move forward with the plan.

“When somebody calls up and says, ‘Hey, I have this building. Do you want to buy it?’ (and) at such a good price, you don’t want to wait around while someone else snatches it up from underneath you,” Harris said.

The asking price is $500,000 below the building’s assessed value, Giddings said. The owners, Harold and June DeArmoun, offered the city a reduced price with conditions that the entire building be used as a public library and Meta Rose remains somewhere in the name, Giddings said.

Even with the $400,000 the city is slating for retrofitting, the price is still below what the building is actually worth, Giddings said, as well as being well below what new construction would have cost.

Councilwoman Nancy Hall said the council unanimously voted to go ahead with the contract.

“The existing library is way too small,” Hall said. “The land available to build a new building isn’t exactly in the downtown core area. The (Meta Rose) building is there. It’s in the downtown core. It definitely keeps people coming. And it has parking.”

Committee feels snubbed

That the library’s current building is insufficient is nothing new. A steering committee composed of three city officials and four local residents was created in 2008 to examine the library’s challenges and potential solutions.

The language of the ordinance creating the committee cited its expressed purpose as “gathering information and making recommendations to the City Council concerning the construction or acquisition of a building to house the city library and other cultural services.”

Yet, said committee member Annette Andres, the steering committee was never contacted about any plans regarding the Meta Rose. Members were not asked their opinions and never had a chance to discuss it, she said.

“We still have not been formally informed,” Andres said.

Even before the committee was created, Andres said community members have spent years gathering information, applying for grants and determining Wasilla’s needs. The Friends of the Wasilla Library have been working to this end for eight years. And yet, she said, that group did not receive word of the city’s plan until Monday.

Andres said other organizations have been involved with efforts to get a new building for the library. Now, not only does this latest development potentially jeopardize the relationship with the Rasmuson Foundation and future grants through that charitable group, it also leaves Valley Performing Arts and its plans for a joint library/theather facility out of the picture, she said.

“To not even have been asked, ‘Do you think this would be a good purpose for this building?’ It borders not only on insult and the lack of due diligence seeming to be not wise, but it also doesn’t bode well for the level of maturity of our city nor the seriousness with which we should be taking into account these decisions,” Andres said.

Giddings, who is one of the city’s representatives on the library steering committee, said the time frame was too condensed to bring the purchase up to the committee. The $500,000-off deal was only good through the end of this year, he said, as capital gains taxes are set to increase in 2010 and the DeArmouns wanted to sell before then.

That’s little consolation for Jeanne Troshynski, the chairwoman of the library steering committee and president of the Friends of the Wasilla Library.

“I heard a rumor (of the deal) on Saturday and spent the weekend trying to track it down. But I didn’t know for sure until I heard Monday on the news,” Troshynski said. “I am amazed that the city council — who I speak to every month — and the mayor would not have the courtesy to let anyone on the steering committee know.”

What’s more, Troshynski said, the Meta Rose Square is 21,000 square feet, much smaller than the 37,000 square feet the committee determined a new library should be to meet the needs of the community.

“It’s frustrating,” she said. “We worked with a consultant. We’ve really tried to be diligent making sure we’ve looked at what the community needs. Now, it’s all for naught.”

Troshynski said the steering committee was looking at 2013 as its goal for a new library. While the municipal bond market may be tough now, she said the city would not need to start looking for serious funding until after the economy recovered. The committee is also lobbying to the Alaska Legislature to put money behind its commitment to fund half of the cost of building a new library.

“This was not going to be a sales tax funded project,” she said.

With this in mind, she said she would understand if the Meta Rose was perhaps an interim location while a new building was completed. However, all indications, she said, are that the city will not begin to move the library until 2011.

Tenants given more

consideration

What she is referring to is the promise the city has made to the current tenants for more than a year find new locations.

“We are going to give them until the end of next Christmas until we start making the transition,” Giddings said.

While the temporary stay on eviction is nice, the tenants of Wasilla’s only indoor shopping mall said they were shocked by the news.

“I was sort of blindsided, or shocked,” said Flowers by Louise owner Louis Davis. “We all knew the DeArmouns had discussed selling it before, but we all assumed it would be to somebody else who would keep it as retail space.”

Davis has been at the Meta Rose for more than 20 years and attributes her success to the foot traffic of the location and spill-over from other businesses in the center. Now, faced with the prospect of moving, Davis is uncertain about where she goes from here.

“I don’t have a clue,” she said. “Obviously, I’ve got to do some thinking about it and praying about it. Hopefully, God will smack me on the head trying to tell me something.”

All I Saw Cookware has been at the Meta Rose since it was constructed, owner David Nyberg said. Like Davis, Nyberg said being in the only “quasi-mall” in Wasilla has allowed him to be successful. He is not pleased with the prospect of getting kicked out, but understands the reasoning and rights of the owners.

“When we are forced to leave, we will either find a new place or do other things,” he said. “We haven’t made any decisions. We are just going to take it calm and get though this Christmas. The first of the year, we will start to think about what we’re going to do.”

The money to buy the building still has to go through the city’s appropriation process, Giddings said. There will be an ordinance introduced at the next city council meeting on Monday, and a public hearing will follow.

Contact Todd L. Disher at todd.disher@frontiersman.com or 352-2252.

Comments

46 comment(s)

    spellcheque wrote on Dec 1, 2009 2:51 PM:

    " Good content "Learn your Facts". Maybe slow down the typing and proof read before you submit next time. FACT IS that the agrrement to review and add the land aquisition purchase to the agenda is ALL that was approved by Council. Executive sessions don't mean the council can make decisions behind close doors without due process. Only discuss PRIOR to adding to the NEXT agenda. Stop by a City Council meeting sometime and see if you can learn as much as a High School Student learns there. The good AND bad of government. They can and do attend. "

    Learn your facts wrote on Nov 30, 2009 4:34 PM:

    " If only the right to free speech was EARNED through educating oneself on the facts BEFORE being allowed to make comment on a subject. It's time those who wish to be heard stepped away from the Grapevine and get engaged in controlling your own destiny.....or simple remian silent. remember to thank the folks that kepo you free and tuaght you how to read. "

    Boots wrote on Nov 27, 2009 6:56 PM:

    " A disaster waiting to happen! One of the worst traffic area in Wasilla.I cannot see that we the people who use the Library will be gaining ,only another Old Building.
    One of the problem now is PARKING! Count the slots at Meta Rose we would not be gaining MUCH more parking. I lived here a long time the Meta Rose Bldg to be turned in to a Library will COST LOTS OF MONEY.
    The only ones gaining by this
    purchase is the DeAmouran's to add to their retirement fund. I vote NO! "

    2good2Btrue wrote on Nov 26, 2009 2:04 PM:

    " When something looks too good to be true, it usually is. The Meta Rose Square has major problems that I'm certain haven't been disclosed to the buyers. Wonder why the city is getting such a screaming deal and this was done hush hush? You won't wonder for long after the sale goes through and the merchants that have been nursing the place along are gone. "

    John Weis wrote on Nov 26, 2009 7:34 AM:

    " The mall will not meet the needs of a library. Why is this purchase being rammed through by the mayor and his cronies? "

    Slow Down wrote on Nov 25, 2009 12:17 PM:

    " This is spending free for all. How did spending for the library move to the top of the list of priorities. Mascot will go under, Firemen are volunteers, Sewer rates are doubled and we spend on a library that works just fine. What about selling the old library to help offset costs of a new building. ADN reports even more spending plans for library remodeling. This new mayor definetly neds some oversight. I suggest there are about four or five people ramming this thru. Didn't we learn anything from the last behind closed doors mall fiasco? "

    there will be wrote on Nov 23, 2009 1:19 PM:

    " what difference does it make if they have signed a purchase agreement? They really dont need a public hearing for anything.
    I do not see why it was in executive session, this should ALL be ON THE RECORD "

    There will be wrote on Nov 22, 2009 10:22 PM:

    " There will be a public hearing. There has to be one. It is on the agenda for the up coming meeting to be introduced for public hearing on December 14th. If you really care so much why don't you read the packets and agendas? It sounds to me like there are some egos involved on this blog. This is a good solution to a problem Wasilla has had for many years. Those of you who are complaining about the money probably don't even visit the library. Show up at the meeting. "

    Julie M wrote on Nov 22, 2009 3:24 PM:

    " How do they get away with this without a public hearing? A pretty large expenditure with no public input bothers me. "

    Unspoken words wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:24 PM:

    " I agree. Why do they use executive session? So the Council and Mayor can make decisions that will never see the light of day. Nothing of the executive session meetings is ever recorded, it never is released to the public and there are choices make in these meetings that affect every taxpayer. Everything from which property they're going to buy, to which director gets a huge, fat raise, to all sorts of other issues they "feel is too sensitive" to be seen or heard by the public. It's all wrong but sanctioned by Rupright. "

    Guest wrote on Nov 22, 2009 12:21 AM:

    " ValleyMessenger wrote on Nov 20, 2009 2:17 AM:

    " I just hope you've all been attending the COW council meetings, if not, than shame on you. You would have known this was coming. "

    I have attended the COW and NO it was not comming.......not META ROSE.... "

    Citizen of Wasilla wrote on Nov 22, 2009 12:18 AM:

    " The words "executive session" scare me. Those words usually mean...unethical, illegal, personal interest. Meta Rose would be great IF Wasilla will stay the same size. Do not think so. My feeling is that something dirty is in the air and AS USUAL the citizens will suffer. Is Mativa involved? Obviously no thought to future growth was involved....again...shows me this decision was about a specific interest that had nothing to do with Wasilla, the public nor the library...any thought to traffic flow and limited parking? Sorry...using too much logic for the City of Wasilla. "

    Librarian Mom wrote on Nov 21, 2009 6:44 PM:

    " I think the location and choice of building is great. I will visit the library every time I come to town now that I know there will be a parking space available. "

    Unspeakable wrote on Nov 20, 2009 9:39 PM:

    " What amazes me and should terrify everyone is how the council voted behind closed doors to move forward with this transaction. Apparently not one member of the council stood up against this and forced their will upon the taxpayer. Archie Giddings is raming this down our throat like he did with Meritage and now the council is buying it. I don't think Keller had as much to do with Meritage as Giddings did. Time for him to go and vote out the council. Rupright, what are you doing to protect the taxpayer and keep us informed? "

    JustMe wrote on Nov 20, 2009 8:31 PM:

    " When Emperor Rupright and Godfather Zamarello's annexation takes place, the eight business owners of Meta Rose Square will have their choice of moving into one of Petes' strip-malls he'll be developing on KGB or Jacobsen Lake. There is a plan my friends, you just don't have any say in it. "

    lee wrote on Nov 20, 2009 5:52 PM:

    " wasn't Wasilla just whining about not having much money, and needing to "Force" annexation upon others to make up there revenue gap?? and yet they have money to buy buildings? here's a clue, grade youre da* roads and learn how to live within youre existing means...absolutely pathetic management "

    Pat wrote on Nov 20, 2009 7:27 AM:

    " I live in Wasilla and I for one feel that this is not the direction I want the city to go. When the mayor and council make decisions for the city without any public comment what does that say for the future. Not much. "

    ValleyMessenger wrote on Nov 20, 2009 2:17 AM:

    " I just hope you've all been attending the COW council meetings, if not, than shame on you. You would have known this was coming. "

    Juliet delaney wrote on Nov 20, 2009 1:15 AM:

    " Were are the retailers going to I'd that just doesn't matter "

    city resident wrote on Nov 19, 2009 7:30 PM:

    " This is the case of a used coat from an older brother that is short in the arms and tight across the shoulders but hey its better than the old one. So little Johnnie sit down and shut up. Its better than the one you had.
    Dad can now cross THAT issue off his need to do list and Mom did't even have to get involved. "

    Poor VPA wrote on Nov 19, 2009 7:23 PM:

    " We love VPA and i hope they keep chipping away to get a new building. I loved the joint library-VPA plan. This is a sad day for those of us who love live theater and understand the need for a new building. Keep going after those grants and get the new building. "

    Greased Rails wrote on Nov 19, 2009 5:20 PM:

    " This is moving too fast.......

    How do we know what else is out there. Probably could of bought carrs for that and we could of gotten a new food store. It just tastes wrong to move so fast with little public input. Lots of eyes are better that just the mayors one?

    Meta Rose would make a better City hall than a library!

    Hey did any Contractor run this thru planning. It would get choked in public hearings. "

    Parking..Parking..where have you been wrote on Nov 19, 2009 12:45 PM:

    " The city bought the lots across the street months ago. Why don't you take a trip to Wasilla and see the parking. There is no reason to purchase, then design, then pay a contractor Davis Bacon wages to build something in a gravel pit. You would not get the land and dirt work done for what they payed for this building with parking, and parking across the street. Just get informed, I know you don't live here thank god. Way to go Mayor and Council maybe the other governments here can learn how to jump on a great deal? "

    Agree w curious wrote on Nov 19, 2009 11:02 AM:

    " Has an inspection been done on this building to see why the owner is giving it to the City at such a low price? Is the City going to tear it down & build a suitable library or just try & shove things in place? Sounds like another one of King Rupwrong's behind the scenes deals. And, it smells rotten. Why wasn't the library steering committee invited to the meeting behind closed doors with council? That smells even more so. "

    SET wrote on Nov 19, 2009 10:57 AM:

    " Just like kids with change buring a hole in their pockets. Just got to spend it. Totally frivolus. Irrational. Irresponsible.
    Watch out. Somewhere in the near future the city will need more money to keep up with expenses and start talking about raising the sale tax. Probably for the upkeep on the expensive library property and the new employees it will need to maintain the new building. Where was the input from the people on this purchase??????? Hear it citizens? Tick...Tick....Tick. The sound of your money being thrown away. "

    fishhook wrote on Nov 19, 2009 8:25 AM:

    " we shop and eat at the meta rose. we like it alot, and are sad to see it go. on the other hand, the current wasilla library is horrible, and we are glad to see it move into this building. i hope all details of this project are reviewed carefully, and we hope the transition is smooth. thanks to the owners for dropping their price to make sure that the building gets used for the library. "

    all for it wrote on Nov 19, 2009 7:10 AM:

    " Any expansion of any library is good. Just because they did not go to each individual and ask permission doesn't make it bad. Libraries need to be improved, expanded, and their use encouraged. "

    Tycho wrote on Nov 19, 2009 7:09 AM:

    " Well, that's how Wasilla does it. Hurry up and throw it on the wall, then see if it sticks. This will probably turn out about as well as the sports arena. Strictly amateur hour. "

    wow wrote on Nov 19, 2009 7:08 AM:

    " HOW MUCH WILL IT COST to re-model this structure so it is suitable for a library? This price tag is hardly a "Good Deal". One should NEVER buy things when there is a pressure to "BUY NOW" or the deal is off.

    It might be more feasible to purchase property in the core area and build a new building. "

    Congratulations wrote on Nov 18, 2009 6:28 PM:

    " Congratulations Wasilla! You're being hit with a huge sewer and water increase and most likely will see a huge sales tax increase to pay for a sweetheart deal on ANOTHER library with inadequate parking, traffic congestion that will keep the kids dodging while trying to go the library, and put money in the pockets of the seller and most likely the buyers. What's wrong with this picture? Can someone spell Meritage? I wonder if the Meta Rose will end up as big a blight as the last city blunder orchestrated by Gidding, Keller and Company? "

    LIFELONG resident. wrote on Nov 18, 2009 1:19 PM:

    " ......"The rich rules over the poor, and the borrower is the servant to the lender"
    Proverbs 22:7 "

    jmer wrote on Nov 18, 2009 1:14 PM:

    " HAS ANYONE THOUGHT ABOUT PARKING? IT CERTAINLY DOESN'T SOUND LIKE IT. WOULD BE BETTER TO EITHER BUILD OR PURCHASE A BLDG. WITH AMPLE PARKING. "

    just a mom wrote on Nov 18, 2009 11:37 AM:

    " I wish they would build the library closer to Wonderland Park. Make it near where the kids are and the public safety building. If it was near the safety building maybe the local safety officers would be able to mentor the kids. There is also plenty of parking there.Parking at the current library is awful. Parking will still be an issue if they put in the Meta Rose Square. "

    John Harkey wrote on Nov 18, 2009 10:47 AM:

    " Sad news indeed, how can the City warrant the expense of such a project at a time we need to cut not increase such services. What a shame and sham for the majority of taxpayer and the small businesses in that mall. "

    Sweethear Deal wrote on Nov 18, 2009 10:33 AM:

    " There are a lot of buildings for sale. Proximity is interesting, but advertising a RFP and getting the most competitive is needed. Ut does seem odd to expand librayies when nationally they are hurting due to the internet. A little more thought may need to go into this idea. I hope it is only an idea now. "

    curious wrote on Nov 18, 2009 10:27 AM:

    " This may turn out ok but I'm skeptical about a few things. Are there any guesses as to how much the coversion will cost? I'll bet anyone it will cost nearly double what current estimate is. what shape is this place in? How is the roof, furnace, etc? I think the list of potential buyers is pretty small. Who else could have jumped on this and closed by 12/31. Banks want 25% down unless you do a gov't program and those ain't closing by year end. Hope council thought it through. "

    EML wrote on Nov 18, 2009 10:06 AM:

    " Impulse behavior has a long history of being associated with immaturity, primitivism, foolishness, “defects of the will”, lower intelligence, and even social deviance, and criminality. (Böhm-Bawerk [1889] 1959; Freud, [1896] 1911; Mill [1848] 1909). "

    Great Move for the Library wrote on Nov 18, 2009 9:22 AM:

    " I hoped for a VPA/Library complex but this idea is even better. 10 years of watching FOL & city I can hardly believe a decision was actually made. There are some people who will not allow things to happen unless its their idea. And some who will not allow even a resident of 10 years to have an impact - to the Friends - book sales and bake sales were not going to get you there. Too short sighted - good job to the council! "

    allisaw wrote on Nov 18, 2009 9:17 AM:

    " it's a great idea! brave, bold, and needed to happen long ago. though there is a gravel pit next to the wasilla middle school that a new library could've been built on (contrary to what nancy hall said) but that land is most likely way over priced. "

    Great Move wrote on Nov 18, 2009 7:01 AM:

    " Lots or room and paved parking in the heart of downtown. I can see to value with this plan. Some will be unhappy because it's new....too bad. Look at our National ecomomy this was a smart move, so the steering committie shut up we now have space. They would had liked it if we imposed a tax to pay for Noah's Ark looking bulding with 1% for the arts. Most of these comments come from "you people" living outside the city. We really don't care what you want. I don't want most of you in the CITY. "

    Valley Library Patron wrote on Nov 17, 2009 10:59 PM:

    " What a great move by the City Council. A quality building and you couldn't ask for a better location in Wasilla, and the only comment from a "steering" committee member was to whine that they weren't consulted. They should be jumping for joy, but instead they want to study it for another 8 years,I also applaud Wasilla for using the tax dollars they are collecting, much from non residents, instead of sticking their hand out to the State or a Foundation. Those two stores have a lot of local fans. They will survive fine in another location. "

    offsoapstone wrote on Nov 17, 2009 10:22 PM:

    " And to the folks that want wasilla to go ahead with annexation your going to get what? "

    molly wrote on Nov 17, 2009 9:14 PM:

    " Common sense would dictate that this building is not suitable for a library.
    The city should not be tempted to the "Buy Now" gimmick.
    Something sounds shady in this deal. "

    Executive session wrote on Nov 17, 2009 9:04 PM:

    " This decision was made in executive session? What else are they deciding in there without consent of the public? The same decisions that were made on behalf of Meritage? Government at its worst no doubt. "

    Oops wrote on Nov 17, 2009 8:29 PM:

    " This is sad news, the library should find another place that's not in the heart of shopping, let merchants have the Meta Square. We all know it's a done deal without the citizens input, that in itself is sad. "

    Hmmm wrote on Nov 17, 2009 7:04 PM:

    " Sounds like typical Giddings actions of doing first and asking for permission later. He crossed Ms. Andres one and looks like he didn't learn. I'm sure he was doing the bidding of the mayor so it will be interesting to see if Rupright takes responsibility for this or uses Giddings as his scapegoat. This is not a good plan and the Council should run from this "deal" as fast as they can! "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   




Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage