MEA president survives effort to oust

By Andrew Wellner
Frontiersman
Published on Tuesday, February 12, 2008 2:36 AM AKST

PALMER — Lee Jordan survived an effort Monday to remove him as president of the Matanuska Electric Association’s Board of Directors.

It all started with debate over $108.69.

On Jordan’s financial statements for his re-election campaign this year, he states that the money is carryover from his 2005 campaign. That has a vocal group of utility members crying foul. The utility’s bylaws, they say, state that all money left over at the end of a campaign has to be disposed of.

“It’s a rather niggling amount of money to get upset about, but it’s a violation of our bylaws by our president,” said Kevin Brown, an MEA member-owner who addressed the board Monday.

Director Lois Lester made the motion that Jordan be removed as president in light of the alleged improper transfer of campaign funds. The vote tied 3-3, but had it passed, the motion would not have removed Jordan from the board.

The board president normally doesn’t vote on motions unless it’s to break a tie. In the case of Lester’s motion, a two-thirds majority was needed for it to pass. With the vote tied 3-3, the motion had failed and Jordan did not cast a vote.

To allow Jordan to remain as president “sends a message to the members that we don’t care, because he’s our president and he can do what he wants,” Lester said.

Lester joined board members Peter Burchell and Katie Hurley in voting to remove Jordan. Directors David Dahms, Larry DeVilbiss and David Glines voted to keep Jordan as board president.

“This is just about headlines and politicking,” DeVilbiss said of Lester’s motion.

Jordan agreed. He said that if board members want to remove him they should file a complaint or launch an investigation.

“These accusations have been made against the president of the board this evening and there has been no follow-up,” Jordan said. “If you want to take action, take action. But let’s stop the headline hunting.”

As for the $108 and change, Jordan said he rolled the money over on advice from his accountant, who told him that’s how campaign money works.

“I don’t believe that Wal-Mart or Lowe’s goes to the bank on Dec. 31 and takes all their money out, then on Jan. 1 puts it all back,” he said.

Jordan contrasted Monday’s proceedings to those conducted in 2005 when Burchell was reprimanded for not making full disclosure of his campaign funds. That reprimand was also at issue Monday. According to a resolution the MEA board passed at that time, $2,484.33 did not show up on Burchell’s disclosure sheets.

The board decided at the time that its reprimand should be sent to member-owners soon after its passage and “also at any time in the future that Mr. Burchell again officially becomes a candidate for an MEA board seat,” according to the resolution.

MEA General Manager Wayne Carmony told the board that according to the Burchell resolution he had to send the reprimand to member-owners, which could affect the outcome of his re-election and spark considerable debate.

“I do not believe that it is in the association’s best interest to pursue this at this time,” Carmony said.

DeVilbiss pointed out that Burchell’s actions had affected an election and to say that the 2005 incident shouldn’t be brought back up this time around to avoid affecting another election is “bizarre.”

Eventually, the board directed Carmony to disregard the portion of the resolution directing him to resurrect the resolution.

Contact Andrew Wellner at andrew.wellner@frontiersman.com or 352-2270.

Comments

16 comment(s)

    Reality check wrote on Feb 18, 2008 10:35 PM:

    " Hey Buddy, you sound like Tuckerman or one of his area attack dogs.

    Mere repetition of the charge that "MEA haters" are a "small but organized group" hardly makes it true.

    You guys are in deep denial if you think a handful of malcontents could take down your coal plan. You've awakened a lot of people who were not previously paying attention.

    Burchell and Kincaid will be the beneficiaries in the board election, then the real house-cleaning can begin over in that rats nest at MEA headquarters. "

    kwb wrote on Feb 17, 2008 6:43 PM:

    " Actually, there have been over 40 articles and letters between the ADN, Frontiersman, and Alaska Star either supporting Kincaid and Burchell, questioning MEA's decision not to inform voters when ballots are rejected, or otherwise questioning the election process. That's hardly a small group. More importantly, where are all the letters singing Jordan's and Baird's praises or making some kind of argument for Jordan and Baird AT ALL? "

    Buddy wrote on Feb 17, 2008 11:03 AM:

    " Wild Child says: "If a whole community is in an uproar and writing letters and posting comments about MEA and its Board of Directors, then there must truly be a significant problem."

    I am sorry to inform you that it is NOT a whole community. It is but a small but organized group of MEA haters, many of whom are not even members of MEA. Keep MEA reliable: Vote Baird and Jordan. "

    Wild Child wrote on Feb 14, 2008 10:02 PM:

    " If a whole community is in an uproar and writing letters and posting comments about MEA and its Board of Directors, then there must truly be a significant problem. I believe that board members like Burchell and Kincaid, along with others, see very concerning issues facing our members. Issues that obviously need to be addressed and fixed. Burchell and Kincaid have the knowledge, drive, and problem solving skills to fix the problem(s), yet they are perceived as a threat. They are working to better our MEA - why is that so hard to comprehend? I back them 100%. "

    kwb wrote on Feb 14, 2008 12:51 PM:

    " Really, where does all the union-hating come from out here? Why are people opposed to collective bargaining and people banding together to make sure that all are treated fairly. For that matter, I'm a big believer in people being able to get the salary and benefits they negotiate for. It's part of the deal you make when you sell your labor to any company, and the company bargains right back. So why are so many people angry about it? Are all union members dedicated hard workers? No. Are all non-union workers? Also no. "

    Wasilla27 wrote on Feb 14, 2008 9:46 AM:

    " To Lisa: Not only that, but the union bashers seem to have no problem with the horrendously top heavy MEA management and the six-digit salaries they're all raping ratepayers for. Time for change. Vote for Burchell and Kincaid, and vote yes for the bylaw change. "

    vote counts wrote on Feb 14, 2008 8:11 AM:

    " You telling me all union workers are dedicated, hard working individuals? What planet are you on? I know more union guys that are fat, over paid, lazy slobes then ones that are dedicated. A private company survives on reputation, not union dues. A private company will fire slackers to keep its good reputation. The union hides slackers because they are "union due paying customers" or the relative of high up union member. "

    lisa geiger wrote on Feb 13, 2008 10:38 PM:

    " So what's wrong with the Union guys making sure we can cook our Turkey on Christmas Day? What is it worth to you to have the fan going on your furnace when it's 30 below? You wanna pay mnimum wage to a lineman and hope to attract that guy's dedication to the job to keep you warm? Give me a break. I'm not a union member, but I just can't see the union bashers making a point here. All I can say is that you get what you pay for. I like it hot. Thanks guys. "

    Votes count wrote on Feb 13, 2008 3:48 PM:

    " My solution is simple; next election I am voting for NONE of the incumbents. I will vote for Snoopy or Charlie Brown first. "

    Wasilla27 wrote on Feb 13, 2008 9:29 AM:

    " Fred Agree speaking anything but the truth? Nah. Fred Agree smearing someone he disagrees with? Nah.

    Yeah, right. Get a clue Agree. Your criminal friends are going down. "

    kwb wrote on Feb 12, 2008 6:16 PM:

    " Fred: Take a look at the MEA documentation of every penny raised by every candidate. Find FOMS, the Sierra Club, IBEW, or any other environmental groups in the list and I will eat my computer. Do you have any proof of anything you are saying, or are you just trying to smear the candidates you don't like? "

    Fred Agree wrote on Feb 12, 2008 4:35 PM:

    " This has nothing to do with providing electricity to the members. it had to do with politics and Union control of the utility.
    Hurley, Lester, Burchell, and Kinlaid are supported by the friends of the mat Su and the Suierra Club, and providing quality electric survice to us is not an issue with them. They are also in the poxkets of the IBEW, who despite some 100k plus salaries, want to be the fox watching the henhouse.
    MEA has provided great service, and it can only deteriorate quickley if these special interest liberal thugs take over. "

    Your Opinion wrote on Feb 12, 2008 1:58 PM:

    " Just let it go? Translated: It's ok, if it's the people you support breaking the rules.
    Your, ratty little vocal group of management people do not represent me.
    Educate yourself about your community and co-op. Crooks are running the show and you are not smart enough to figure it out.
    "

    brvak wrote on Feb 12, 2008 11:41 AM:

    " The rules are important if they are applied equally. I'd bet that if this were a board member that was not in the graces of the MEA director this issue would be used to dismiss that board member at once. "

    Let it go wrote on Feb 12, 2008 9:21 AM:

    " What a joke! Someone broke the rules? Let it go. Someone's getting special treatment? Let it go. After all, it's one of management's little lapdogs. Anything goes for those chosen few. But woe unto anyone else who does the same thing.

    Hypocrites. Jordan must go. Followed quickly by Carmony, Babcock, Zoerb and Carter.

    Vote Burchell and Kincaid to restore honesty and integrity to MEA. "

    just my opinion wrote on Feb 12, 2008 4:18 AM:

    " That ratty little vocal group of member-owners do not necessarily represent me. I've been a member for many many years and vote faithfully in each and every election, and I accept that maybe my choice didn't get elected but that the majority rule. What's wrong with that? Why does this group think they should override those of us who also voted? My advise, work harder BEFORE the election, then let it go if you don't get your way. LET IT GO! "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   




Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage