MEA ballot grows by 1

By Andrew Wellner
Frontiersman
Published on Friday, January 25, 2008 8:39 AM AKST

MAT-SU — The name of a perennial candidate for the Matanuska Electric Association board will appear on the upcoming ballot after all.

A petition by Tom Staudenmaier of Eagle River to be listed as a candidate for the cooperative’s board of directors was validated after initially being rejected by MEA officials.

This year, Staudenmaier submitted 67 signatures to petition his way on the ballot. The utility’s bylaws require 50 signatures of MEA member-owners. When co-op officials counted up the names, Staudenmaier only had 49, MEA spokeswoman Lorali Carter said.

Staudenmaier said he counted the signatures himself and found one the utility had missed, a Talkeetna bakery owner. Carter confirmed Staudenmaier’s story, saying the woman had signed her name differently than it appears on the utility’s membership rolls.

“They didn’t want a lawsuit,” Staudenmaier said about why MEA is allowing him on the ballot. “We had our lawyers ready to go on Monday.”

Staudenmaier said the utility didn’t want to print his candidate’s statement, which advocates abolishing the co-op in favor of one overarching co-op for Southcentral Alaska.

Carter has said Staudenmaier’s claims are false, noting the utility had printed his statement in the past.

The utility decided to put Staudenmaier on the ballot after receiving a call from the bakery owner, Carter said, adding the utility probably would have taken a lot of flack had it disqualified Staudenmaier because one of his signers used an incorrect name.

Carter said the 44,000 ballots MEA has already had printed will have to be re-printed at a cost of $8,000.

In addition to electing new board members, an initiative on the ballot is also causing a stir. It’s one Palmer businesswoman Janet Kincaid and retired educator and board incumbent Peter Burchell, both running in the election, have put together.

Burchell, Kincaid and Staudenmaier are running against current board president Lee Jordan and former Houston mayor Tom Baird. The two top vote-getters will win the seats in the at-large election.

The initiative, if it passes, would change the utility’s bylaws to say a person is seated on the board within weeks of being elected at the March annual meeting, rather than in July as is now the practice.

MEA plans to print a statement on the ballot summarizing a statement by its bylaws committee that the change would adversely affect the business, Carter said. It’s something MEA has done before when bylaw changes have appeared on the ballot.

While she doesn’t believe the bylaws require the utility to print anything supporting or against an initiative, Carter said MEA management has to consider what’s in the best interest of the utility, and management believes seating new board members earlier than July is not.

“It’s not like this is a detrimental destructive bylaw amendment to the co-op,” Carter said; however, “It creates inconsistencies within the bylaws.”

The bylaws, if changed, would say new board members are seated in March and new officers — president, treasurer and secretary — are selected in June.

What is the utility to do if an officer loses a re-election bid, Carter asked. Should MEA go months without an officer? Should the current officer stay on until July as an officer, but not a board member?

“It’s not a good way to do business,” she said.

Mike Janecek, former MEA board member and a critic of the utility, calls that explanation baloney. The utility wants that window so it can sic its lawyers on candidates who may shake things up. With that extra time, MEA lawyers could find some reason to invalidate the cadidate’s election, Janecek said.

“Their effort would be to find some way in the [five] months that they had ... to get rid of somebody so they can appoint somebody again,” Janecek said.

Janecek said he believes that’s what happened in his own case, he said, in which he was removed from the board and somebody was appointed to replace him.

“Mr. Janecek’s statements are just silly,” Carter said, adding utility management doesn’t have the authority to go after board members it doesn’t like.

Janecek said he intends to find a way to fight the ballot statement in court.

Contact Andrew Wellner at andrew.wellner@frontiersman.com or 352-2270.

Comments

9 comment(s)

    dab, so lets Privatize Power Production wrote on Jan 27, 2008 11:10 AM:

    " There is a Simple solution to monoploy, force them to endorse Private Power companies in the valley allowing production of our power using the subscribers preferred source of fuel, natural gas. Easy solutions get all caught up in the business of being unethical, hey we must be talking about MEA, our local Monopoly, and yes it does appear that some politicians and MEA are on the same power trip and in the same bed as well. Cut off the strings that literally tie the end users to these Utility monopolies! Just say NO! "

    dab wrote on Jan 26, 2008 11:03 AM:

    " I don't think I know of any other coop or board that seems to have all the in house POLITICS that MEA has. Maybe we need to get the REPUBLICAN party politics out of MEA business. The MEA management are all friends of the Jailed legislators, and members of the corrupt club. We need our coop back working for the MEMBERS.They have done nothing for 20 years except talk. "

    New and better MEA wrote on Jan 26, 2008 10:30 AM:

    " MEA appears to be rather shady and very non transparent at the Board and Management levels. Lets hope we are on to a new day of open doors and efficiency regarding any new power plant built to supply our local and statewide power needs. Think out of the box and bring in a privately owned gas plant that will utilize the waste steam to heat our local businesses, state, city and borough buildings as well as private dwellings. Lets think green and be smart, we must utilize the entire potato, not just waste the fat as MEA. "

    comments were taken off site wrote on Jan 26, 2008 10:10 AM:

    " I question why some comments have been removed from this story? Can anyone explain that?? There were several more comments from days past that have been removed? WHY "

    What's Silly wrote on Jan 25, 2008 9:36 PM:

    " is MEA is gonna build us a brand spankin' new G&T and the rates will go down. "

    Tom's Right wrote on Jan 25, 2008 9:17 PM:

    " HMMM... I wonder if one Southcentral electric coop would need all the spin doctors MEA has? I'm not surprised Lora-lie thinks it's silly. "

    Why Silly? wrote on Jan 25, 2008 10:58 AM:

    " Isn't that in fact exactly what they wound up doing to Janecek? Moreover, isn't MEA claiming they need that extra time to do checks on the financial statements from the campaign, do drug testing, etc? If those things AREN'T going to be used to keep an elected board member off the board if the financial reports are bad or the drug tests positive, why are they doing them at all? It is totally a time used to investigate reasons that could keep people off the board...at least that's why they keep saying they need that time. "

    Bylaw Change wrote on Jan 25, 2008 10:53 AM:

    " Actually, the bylaws say that if there is a vacancy among officers of the board, the board can fill that vacancy at any time. If the bylaw change passes, and one or more officers of the board are voted out, the board can select a new person to fill that role until the July election of officers. It also gives new board members a chance to get the swing of things and learn the personalities before they have to vote on officers in July. It just isn't a problem. "

    Seriously? wrote on Jan 25, 2008 10:51 AM:

    " The woman who signed Staudenmaier's petition had a hyphenated last name in MEA records and just signed with the last part of her last name on the petition. And they couldn't find her? Couldn't take those extra 10 seconds to look under maiden name or last-hyphenate? How about an address search, since signers include that too? Doesn't sound like they wanted him on the ballot and this was a convenient way to accomplish that, and they got called on it. Lorali is right though, there would have been "flack". Nice dig about the extra cost reprinting ballots for him though. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage